BUYING IPHOTO PRO

I have to say a lot of people had made very good posts about the whole situation. (that is of apps that arnвЂ™t given apps that everyone uses, like webbrowsers. If it does, I think it will be the most important app ever to me. I so hope it lives up to what IвЂ™m seeing. ItвЂ™s cheaper then CS2 (half the price I think).

This apps will be bought by amateurs in flocks.

BUYING IPHOTO PRO

Photography is done by way more people then any of the other areas covered by apples pro apps. This will almost definitely go on to be the biggest pro app apple has ever created. Just the whole viewing possibility is in make it worth it (partially since OSX lacks a proper built in image viewer) And definitely not something this fast or user friendly. There really is nothing that comes close to this currently. then Adjusting things like white-balance, making B&W conversions, cropping, resizing, and exporting/printing final prints. Also photoshop is overkill, since all one really cares about if your not into destroying photos, is preserving your files, adding any needed meta data, renaming and such. Currently this is a painful process with apps like photoshop. But what people who shoot in raw like myself have been waiting for is a app that lets us shoot in just raw, dump the files to our computer/laptops and open them all up quickly and see what we got. PS really isnвЂ™t a great tool for doing digital photography development. ItвЂ™s not iPhoto Pro, itвЂ™s a just a great app that holds its own. This is the app the entire Digital Photography world has been waiting for. The Intel roadmap does look promising 2006 and later. What we will see on Apple machines will not be the Pentium 4 line, but Pentium M derivatives. FYI, even though the Pentium 4 is a piece of garbage (even Intel agrees, they are bagging it,) the Pentium M is well designed and has legs to grow. But pragmatically, I think Intel just made them a deal they could not turn down, and AMD couldnвЂ™t match. You can argue that AMD would have been a better choice, and I do like AMD better. IsnвЂ™t it obvious? With no mobile G5 on the horizon, their laptop line was doomed to irrelevance (I am amazed it isnвЂ™t already). I canвЂ™t believe that people are still moaning about the fact that Apple is switching to Intel. I can tell you for a fact that my coworkerвЂ™s Linux laptop (with a 2.1 GHz Pentium M) is almost 3 times faster than my Mac. Granted they are slick, but 1 1.67GHz G4 does not sound much better to me than what you could get 3 years ago (granted theyвЂ™ve added RAM, better GPU, etc, but still). However, I am amazed that people still buy Powerbooks from Apple. I think it is a super slick machine, and it has served me well for the past 3.5 years. I have a dual 1GHz G4 Powemac as my main work station. Looking at that for all the MHZ people out there, Apples offering compares WELL to other CPU venders DUAL CORE MHZ OFFERINGS! Simple point, current DUAL CORE Intel is 2.8ghz, AMD 2.4 ghz, and G5 2.5 ghz. вЂ“ so Apple are competitive in terms of processing power on their workstations, and that is good. Each core has 2MB of L2 cache, but otherwise it canвЂ™t even keep up most of the time with a 1.8GHz dual-core chip from AMD.ДЄMD only recently released a 2.4GHz dual-core processor. It runs at a top speed of 2.8GHz (and no motherboards are available yet, I read a review of IntelвЂ™s just released Paxville dual-core Xeon today. Now about the current Apple offering, I want to post a message someone else somewhere posted that summed things up to me: Even Intel are trying to back away from the whole MHZ thing (look at how well a lower specвЂ™ed MHZ Pentium M compares to a higher specвЂ™ed MHZ P4). Seems like a lot of people are still wrapped up in MHZ for specвЂ™ing cpus.

Buying iphoto